Background
Research
Group Members
Key Publications

3’-5’ cyclic Adenosine MonoPhosphate (cAMP) is a fundamental second messenger that controls numerous cellular tasks spanning from mitochondrial function to cell death and the force of heart contractions. It is not thus a surprise that deregulation of the cAMP pathway has been connected to a number of human diseases including cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders and cancer.
The cAMP signalling cascade was long regarded as a linear pathway, however this simplistic model could not explain the functional pleitropy of this second messenger. Indeed, thanks to the development of sophisticated imaging tools, we now know that cyclic AMP (cAMP), organizes its pathway in distinct signalling (microdomains) that enable cAMP rises triggered by various stimuli to be transduced in specific cellular functions.
Despite strong evidence supporting the functional significance of cAMP microdomains, the mechanisms underpinning their creation and eventually coupling specific cAMP events to distinct functions are largely unknown. Increasing our understanding of these mechanisms and identifying the molecular plays that are engaged in the generation of cAMP microdomains holds great promise for the treatment of disease where the cAMP/PKA axis is a causal factor.

Ongoing projects and Future Research Plans

Currently we have three research projects in the lab:
• Investigating the mechanisms underpinning the creation of distinct cAMP/PKA signalling events at the outer mitochondrial membrane.
• Identifying the molecular players through which the cAMP/PKA axis exerts its regulatory effects on mitochondrial dynamics.
• Investigating the role of cAMP/PKA in the balance between cell death and survival with particular focus on non-apoptotic programmed cell death.

We approach the study of cAMP microdomains at multiple levels, integrating classic biochemistry, molecular biology and single cell real time fluorescence imaging techniques. We are developing and validating new methodologies and tools able to measure and/or manipulate the cAMP cascade with unprecedented specificity. Using this molecular toolbox we aim to study the signals that trigger sharply defined cAMP/PKA events. Finally by combining our tools to “omics” we plan to identify the molecular players through which each cAMP microdomain is transduced in cellular function.

Identifying new regulators of cAMP compartmentalization

Despite decades of intensive research on cAMP microdomains the molecular mechanisms by which cAMP achieves the spatio-temporal organization of its cascade remain poorly understood and hotly debated. The leading view is that the actions of phosphodiesterases (PDEs), the enzymes that hydrolyze cAMP, determine which microdomains will be activated (allowing high cAMP levels) or will remain inert (maintaining low cAMP levels) in response to a given cAMP-generating signal. Based on this model cAMP microdomains could be defined as “subcellular sites where the concentration of cAMP is distinguishable from that of the surrounding areas”. However, mathematical models argue against the ability of sole PDEs to create cAMP microdomains and clearly suggest the existence of additional unidentified mechanisms.
In order to better understand whether differences in local cAMP levels mirror the spatially restricted activation of its main effector protein kinase A (PKA) we developed a co-culture approach that allow us to simultaneously measure in real time in single living cells cAMP levels and PKA activity in response to a given stimuli (fig 1) (Burdyga A & Lefkimmiatis K. Methods in Molecular Biology; 2015; 1294:1-12). By using immortalized cell lines and primary neonatal ventricular rat cardiomyocytes we are dissecting the roles that each component of the cAMP/PKA axis has in the creation of cAMP microdomains.

Investigate the involvement of Mitochondrial cAMP/PKA domains in mitochondrial processes

While it well known that PKA at the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) regulates numerous mitochondria-related functions such as apoptosis and mitochondrial fission, little is known of whether this distinct cAMP/PKA microdomain is involved in other mitochondrial processes. For instance it has been proposed that generalized cAMP elevations could both protect depolarized mitochondria from being targeted by mitophagy (Akabane S et.al Mol.Cell 2016) and increase the retrograde movement of defective organelles in neurons (Ogawa et.al. ACS chemical neuroscience, 2016). Both these processes (mitophagy and trafficking) are highly specific and target exclusively distinct organelles, therefore we asked the question of whether recognizable cAMP/PKA signatures may define which process a mitochondrion would undertake.
Thanks to the extensive molecular toolbox we developed for the measure (fig 2) and manipulation of different aspects of the cAMP signaling cascade we are in the unique position to test this possibility. For instance thanks to sensitive FRET-based sensors we plan to measure cAMP and PKA phosphorylation levels in individual mitochondria undergoing retrograde or anterograde trafficking. In addition we will take advantage of targeted versions of a photoactivatable adenylyl cyclase (bPAC) to selectively increase cAMP and consequently PKA activity at the OMM of distinct mitochondria, while, on the contrary, a targeted version of a genetically encoded cAMP buffer will decrease the levels of messenger only at the mitochondrial surface. Using combinations of these tools we will investigate the molecular mechanisms through which the cAMP/PKA axis is involved in mitochondria trafficking and recycling.

Investigate the molecular mechanisms and identify the molecular players underpinning the ability of cAMP to influence cell fate.

Multicellular organisms maintain their cell number by balancing cellular proliferation with cell death. Each of these processes has essential roles, and their deregulation can result in severe disease. For example, cell proliferation and differentiation are crucial for wound healing and tissue renewal but, if out of control, can result in cancer and autoimmune disease. Equally important is cell death. Cells that are damaged and could compromise the homeostasis of the organism are eliminated through regulated (programmed) forms of cellular death. Until recently, apoptosis was the only form of cellular death considered as regulated; however lately, a novel form of programmed cell death, called necroptosis has been described. The discovery of necroptosis (which can be induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNFα) bares significant clinical weight, as it becomes increasingly clear that this process is involved in human disease. Consequently a better understanding of the mechanisms underpinning necroptosis is of primary importance.
One peculiar characteristic of cAMP is that can induce or inhibit cellular death. While the relation of cAMP/PKA to apoptosis is well studied whether this pathway is involved in the pathways that regulate other forms of programmed cell death is unknown. The major goals of this project are to a) establish whether the cAMP/PKA axis is involved in non-apoptotic forms of cell death and b) identify the molecular players linking the cAMP pathway to programmed cell death. To achieve our goals we designed a multidisciplinary approach that combines bioinformatics to classical biochemistry and high throughput proteomics screenings.

Figure Legends

Figure 1: Co-culture of HEK293 cells expressing a FRET-based PKA activity sensor (AKAR4), or a cAMP probe (EpacH90) together with the fluorescent marker mCherry. The latter was used to distinguish the two cellular populations allowing us to follow simultaneously cAMP variations and consequent PKA activation in the cytosol of neighboring cells.


Figure 2: Co-culture of primary cardiac ventricular myocytes expressing FRET-based cAMP probes targeted at the outer mitochondrial membrane or the parental cytosolic versions.

Franscesca Grisan

Postdoctoral fellow

francesca.grisan@gmail.com

  1. Di Benedetto G, Gerbino A,Lefkimmiatis K.Shaping mitochondrial dynamics: The role of cAMP signalling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017 May 10. pii: S0006-291X(17)30900-2. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.05.041.
  2. Burdyga A &Lefkimmiatis K.Simultaneous assessment of cAMP signalling events in different cellular compartments using FRET-based reporters. Methods in Molecular Biology; 2015; 1294:1-12. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2537-7_1.
  3. Lefkimmiatis K.cAMP signalling meets mitochondrial compartments. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2014 Apr1;42(2): 265-69.
  4. Lefkimmiatis K#, Leronni D, Hofer AM#. The inner and outer compartments of mitochondria are sites of distinct cAMP/PKA signaling dynamics. Journal of Cell Biology. 2013 Aug5;202(3):453-62. # Corresponding author.
  5. Lefkimmiatis K*, Caratozzolo MF*, Merlo P, D’Erchia AM, Navarro B, Levrero M, Sbisa’ E, Tullo A. p73 and p63 sustain cellular growth by transcriptional activation of cell cycle progression genes. Cancer Research. 2009 Nov 15;69(22):8563-71.
  6. Lefkimmiatis K, Moyer MP, Curci S, Hofer AM. “cAMP Sponge”: a Buffer for Cyclic Adenosine 3’, 5’-Monophosphate. PLoS ONE. 2009 Nov 3;4(11):e7649.
  7. Lefkimmiatis K, Srikanthan M, Maiellaro I, Moyer MP, Curci S, Hofer AM. Store-operated cyclic AMP signaling mediated by STIM1. Nature Cell Biology. 2009 Apr;11(4):433-442.

KONSTANTINOS LEFKIMMIATIS

  • 2017-present VIMM Junior Principal Investigator
  • 2017-present Researcher (Tenured) Neuroscience Institute CNR
  • 2013-2016 Intermediate Fellow (University of Oxford)
  • 2010-2013 Instructor (Harvard Medical School)
  • 2006-2010 Postdoc (Harvard Medical School)
  • 2003-2006 Ph.D. in Genetics and Molecular Evolution (University of Bari)
  • 1993-1999 Master’s degree in Biology (University of Bari)